An increasing number of organizations all over the globe are looking at the FAIR standard as their new risk model of choice for assessing risk in financial terms, so that business executives and board of directors can finally fulfill their risk governance roles and make well-informed, cost-effective decisions and achieve the right balance between running the business and protecting their organizations.
The FAIR Institute is an expert, non-profit organization led by risk and security officers, business executives and board members. Its mission is to help provide educational opportunities, foster collaboration among its members and develop and share standard risk management practices based on FAIR.
Factor Analysis of Information Risk (FAIR) is the only international standard analytics model for information security and operational risk.
Such anniversaries are a great opportunity to reflect on the accomplishments of the past year and to share what is coming next. Here are some of the highlights:
The FAIR Institute now counts over 2,500 members and is on a pace to approach 4,000 by the end of 2018. The pace accelerated in the last year, as it took 11 months to add the first thousand members, while it took just 8 months to add the next thousand members.
The membership is also expanding geographically beyond North America, with Europe and Asia/Pacific leading the way. The recent formation of new local FAIR Institute chapters in Paris, Abu Dhabi and Melbourne reflects how memberships in those regions is reaching critical mass for supporting local activities.
Blog readership is at an all-time high with the number of blog subscribers exceeding the FAIR Institute membership.
This past few months have been particularly fertile in terms of the multiplication of education opportunities, which has been a constant request by many members who have been struggling to find FAIR-trained talent to staff their quantitative risk management programs:
Learn more about the FAIR University Curriculum
|
We have been seeing a shift happening in the thinking of some policy makers, as they recognize the limitations and rapid obsolescence of regulations mandating very prescriptive technical measures to reduce cyber and operational risks. The most forward-thinking of them are starting to see the benefits of encouraging an economical approach to the problem, so that finite organizational resources can be applied to where it matters the most (versus what a one-size-fits-all checklist might tell you).
In the US, this shift is evident in:
It is also not surprising then that we have been able to start a dialogue and conduct briefings with both the White House's Office of Management and Budget as well as members of the US Congressional Cybersecurity Caucus.
A 'nota dolens' has been reading the first draft of the proposed 1.1 revision to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF). While the stated goal of the NIST CSF since its inception has been to enable "cost-effective decision making" as it related to cybersecurity investments, the only risk measurement method that is being proposed by NIST in the draft is a qualitative scale (such as 1-4) that has proven to be both ineffective and misleading in terms of making prioritization and resource allocation decisions. Unless new revisions include references to proven standard quantitative risk models such as FAIR, NIST could set the industry back by proposing methods that FAIR Institute members already know don't work.
An exhaustive list of upcoming activities would be too long for this blog post, so we are listing below a brief selection:
In terms of events, it is not too early too sign up for these two trend-setting ones as space is limited:
As President of the FAIR Institute, I would like to conclude this anniversary note by thanking the Institute's leadership and its members who have been offering countless hours and their best ideas on a volunteer basis for the sake of advancing the profession. You are turning the vision and aspirations of a few into a movement that is benefitting the industry at large. I am humbled and inspired and look forward to continue the journey with all of you and all those that will join the movement towards risk economics.