October 16 & 17 | Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA

Join us at the 2018 FAIR Conference

Discover emerging best practices and models for managing information risk from a business perspective.

What is the FAIR Institute?

Factor Analysis of Information Risk (FAIR) has emerged as the standard Value at Risk (VaR) framework for cybersecurity and operational risk.

The FAIR Institute is a non-profit professional organization dedicated to advancing the discipline of measuring and managing information risk.

It provides information risk, cybersecurity and business executives with the standards and best practices to help organizations measure, manage and report on information risk from the business perspective. The FAIR Institute and its community focus on innovation, education and sharing of best practices to advance FAIR and the information risk management profession.

3100+
Member Organization
30%
Fortune 1000
14
Local Chapters
Enter Content Here
A STANDARD BY
partners_12
TECHNICAL ADVISOR
partners_09
SPONSORS
RSA   riskrecon
EDUCATION PARTNERS

SJSU     WASHSTL        UMass Amherst       Ferris State       CMU        Pepperdine       VT   Marymount University  

ASU   University of Tampa    University of Toronto      Related image     Georgia Southern      georgemason     Macquarie     WU

Learn more about our Education Partners

RECENT BLOGS

Five Questions the Board Should Ask the CISO

Board directors and senior executives are obligated to govern their organizations’ cyber risk management efforts. To this end, they are being educated by such organizations as the NACD or the Big 4 on foundational concepts of information security and cyber risk management.

Read More >>

Primary vs. Secondary Loss in FAIR™ Analysis: What's the Difference and Why It Matters

“All models are wrong, but some are useful.” By those words, professor and statistician George Box reminds us that models, including the FAIR™ Model, are approximations of reality.

Read More >>

How FAIR™ Can Help the US Federal Government Better Prioritize and Right-Size Its Cybersecurity Investments

>>DHS/OMB mean well in pushing for a risk-based approach to cybersecurity in the Federal Government, but their requirements fall short of helping agencies effectively prioritize and right-size their cybersecurity investments

Read More >>

SEE ALL BLOGS

POPULAR BLOGS

Post Image
Inherent Risk vs. Residual Risk Explained in 90 Seconds

I recently had a conversation with clients around a risk analysis they conducted and noticed as they walked me through it that they seemed to get hung up on the terms “inherent risk” and “residual...

Read More >>
Post Image
'Risk Appetite' vs. 'Risk Tolerance'. What’s the Difference?

The terms “risk appetite” and its close cousin “risk tolerance” are often poorly understood, very rarely used to good effect, and commonly used interchangeably.

Similar to the word “risk,” you will...

Read More >>
Post Image
NIST Maps FAIR to the CSF - Big Step Forward in Acceptance of Cyber Risk Quantification

It's official: NIST has formally published FAIR as an Informative Reference to the NIST CSF, the most widely used cybersecurity framework in the U.S,  a major milestone in the history of FAIR. This...

Read More >>